Technology: Enterprise Advanced Security (EAS)
01/2022 - 01/2022
Enterprise Advanced Security (EDR): BlackBerry Protect and Optics – PROTECTION

Advanced Security (EDR): BlackBerry Protect and Optics
SE Labs tested BlackBerry Protect and Optics against a range of hacking attacks. These were designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks in the same way as criminals and other attackers breach systems and networks.
We used full chains of attack , meaning that our testers behaved as real attackers, probing targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access. Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions, which might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
Product factsheet:

Advanced Security (EDR): Kaspersky
SE Labs tested Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response against a range of hacking attacks. These were designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks in the same way as criminals and other attackers breach systems and networks.
We used full chains of attack, meaning that our testers behaved as real attackers, probing targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access. Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions, which might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
In this report we explain the threats used and explore how the tested product interacts with them. You might notice a similarity between the way we present this information and the way that the MITRE ATT&CK framework illustrates threat chains. This is not a coincidence. Our goal is to share information in ways that are familiar and easily understandable by the security community and its customers.
Read more of our reports here.

Advanced Security (EDR): CrowdStrike
SE Labs tested CrowdStrike Falcon against a range of hacking attacks. These were designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks in the same way as criminals and other attackers breach systems and networks.
We used full chains of attack, meaning that our testers behaved as real attackers, probing targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access. Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions, which might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
In this report we explain the threats used and explore how the tested product interacts with them. You might notice a similarity between the way we present this information and the way that the MITRE ATT&CK framework illustrates threat chains. This is not a coincidence. Our goal is to share information in ways that are familiar and easily understandable by the security community and its customers.
Read more of our reports here.
08/2021 - 08/2021
Breach Response (NDR Detection): VMware NSX Network Detection and Response 2021 Q3

SE Labs tested VMware NSX Network Detection and Response against a range of hacking attacks designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks in the same way as criminals and other attackers breach systems and networks.
VMware NSX Breach Response Test
Full chains of attack were used, meaning that testers behaved as real attackers, probing targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access. Finally, the testers/attackers attempted to complete their missions, which might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
Tested products from:
APT groups include:
- FIN7 & Carbanak
- OilRig
- APT3
- APT29

SE Labs tested BlackBerry Protect and Optics in this Breach Response test. We pitted it against a range of hacking attacks designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks. These are the same techniques criminals and other attackers use to breach systems and networks in the real world.
Breach Response Test: BlackBerry Protect
Testers used full chains of attack, meaning that they behaved as real attackers. We probed targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access.
Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions. This might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
Tested products from:
SE Labs tested CrowdStrike Falcon in this Breach Response test. We pitted it against a range of hacking attacks designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks. These are the same techniques criminals and other attackers use to breach systems and networks in the real world.
Testers used full chains of attack, meaning that they behaved as real attackers. We probed targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access.
Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions. This might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
SE Labs tested Crowdstrike Falcon in this Breach Response test, pitting it against a range of hacking attacks designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks in the same way as criminals and other attackers breach systems and networks.
Full chains of attack were used, meaning that testers behaved as real attackers, probing targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access.
Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions, which might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.
SE Labs tested SentinelOne in this Breach Response test, pitting it against a range of hacking attacks designed to compromise systems and penetrate target networks in the same way as criminals and other attackers breach systems and networks.
Full chains of attack were used, meaning that testers behaved as real attackers, probing targets using a variety of tools, techniques and vectors before attempting to gain lower-level and more powerful access.
Finally, the testers/ attackers attempted to complete their missions, which might include stealing information, damaging systems and connecting to other systems on the network.